August 2008 Archives

Business and pleasure

user-pic
Vote 0 Votes

[...] This Obama campaign, which I have probably cursed by saying this out loud, looks from the outside like a well-run, contemporary business: seemingly the right mix of enthusiasm and discipline, encouragement and focus. I view organisations like that as a sort of minor miracle, because the working environment has changed so radically in the last decade that I despair of anyone getting it right. You're safer using the old disciplines, but at a cost: that's what makes your company or image appear distant and inhuman compared to the bumbling, chaotic but adventurous alternatives. Bush's skill was appearing human despite that kind of frozen discipline, and you only had to see how badly Gore and Kerry were at imitating the same relaxation to see the challenge of covering up all that machinery.

I suspect that if Obama gets in, they'll be an awful lot of Fast Company-style books written about this campaign, and how to build your business the same way.

That's how Danny O'Brien's Oblomovka post "the business of barack" (via an instant message from Cecily) ends.

SAJAforum: What have been the most significant ways in which you have seen community-based journalism evolve and change over the course of your career?

As media, technology and politics merge, it's become possible for people with few resources to create their own media outlets and disseminate widely. Communities of color are still struggling to get themselves into the mix, but there's far more video, blogging, writing and reporting than there was ten years ago. Activists of color know we're getting killed on cable news and in the blogosphere, so there's an urgency that I didn't feel from the field ten years ago. Giving enough focus to the storytelling remains a challenge -- getting specific, proving every point with reporting, finding people to tell the story through, carving up our journalistic projects into digestible pieces in the age of youtube, and just making sure that our production is high-quality enough to attract the unconverted.
Go read the rest of Anil Kalhan's SAJAforum post "Five Questions for Rinku Sen, Author of 'The Accidental American'"

Removing the symbol

user-pic
Vote 0 Votes
Come Downstairs Now's "long things" by Frances

[...] i end by saying, yes, let us protest, yes let us wear skinny jeans, but do not let this be the symbol of our activism. let the symbol of our activism be our activism. in other words, REMOVE THE SYMBOL! especially when symbols rely on the beholder anyway. [...]

Also: G.M.R.'s Dynamic Street Art post "Today's Street Art: The Stencil as Means of Social Protest," Colby Sledge's "College kids in Tennessee help to spread the green gospel" for The Tennesseean, Nikolas Kozloff's "Danny Glover, Haiti, and the Politics of Revolutionary Cinema in Venezuela" for The Scarlet Pimpernel, and Justine's "Sneaker Activism Pays Off...Well Almost" for Brains On Fire Blog.
So we're back to the question in this post's title. My answer? It'd be nice if it were mine, but I can't labor under any illusions of ownership. After all, Alinsky thought of half the title already, didn't he?

The answer I'm going with, then, is "yours."

If you vote for our panel, you get to offer your best suggestions about what rules for radicals might look like, what ideals and precepts might best survive the meeting place, the neo-nexus, of (for starters) activism, media and technology.

In the meantime, this is as good a place as any to try out some wonderful new blogging software from the fine folks at Six Apart, and to welcome anyone who wants to pitch in and toss some ideas around along the way. Thanks for reading.
While talking with Samhita last month, I remembered reading Laura Miller's Salon.com article "Barack by the books" a couple of days before.

[...] In Chicago, Obama worked for the Developing Communities Project, a church-based group following the grass-roots organizing principles laid out by Saul Alinsky. Alinksy, a Chicago native, famously organized the impoverished Back of the Yards neighborhood in the 1930s and trained several generations of organizers, including César Chávez, before publishing "Rules for Radicals: A Pragmatic Primer for Realistic Radicals" in 1971. (He died the following year.) [...]

So I said "Rules for Radicals, Moves for Media." Then I thought, no, maybe "vs. Media."

I remembered Brian Stelter's New York Times article "The Facebooker Who Befriended Obama."

"In March 2009, people are either going to be dealing with media, organizing and technology by figuring out how to help Obama or combat McCain," I said. "Or, and let's be real, keep Obama on his toes. So he doesn't just do another epic fail like today's vote on FISA."

So we started looking around at last year's panel ideas, I consulted last year's list of panels I thought would be good to check out and she brainstormed in between meetings and training sessions. And we both agreed that it would be an honor to be on a panel with the other.

Now we just have to figure out how to make it happen. That, dear reader, may just be where you come in.
One night a little over five weeks ago, Samhita pops up on Google Talk. She asks if I've put in an idea for a panel for next March's South by Southwest Interactive Festival.

I said I hadn't brainstormed things I'd wanted to do yet. Then I asked her how much time was left before the early-submission deadline: two days, as it turned out.

I asked her if she'd want to talk about making the relationship between citizens and media more equitable, and not just one charged by disruption, disengagement and distancing. I mentioned my panel from last year, "Roll Over Gutenberg and Tell McLuhan The News."

"What's on my mind this time around," I said, "is organizing."

About this Archive

This page is an archive of entries from August 2008 listed from newest to oldest.

September 2008 is the next archive.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.